Month: December 2025

Who First Employed The Term “Hypergamy” to Describe Non-Marital Mating Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology, Or The Manosphere?

/ gynocentrism

The term “hypergamy,” traditionally rooted in marital or caste-based unions, has been extended in evolutionary psychology (EP) and lay discourse to describe women’s preferences for higher-status or higher-value partners in non-marital contexts like dating, short-term mating, serial pairings, or infidelity.

Based on publication timelines and archival searches, the earliest documented uses appear in lay manosphere writings from 2007–2008, predating explicit EP academic adoption by several years. EP’s application emerged around 2008, with growth in the 2010s tied to digital dating data and mate-switching models. Below, I outline the first identified authors, focusing on explicit uses in non-marital frames.

Lay Authors (Manosphere/PUA/Redpill)

Manosphere bloggers and forums adapted “hypergamy” early to explain women’s “branch-swinging” (trading up in casual dating or relationships) and “dual mating strategies” (short-term sex with high-value “alphas” vs. long-term provisioning from “betas”), often drawing loosely on EP but without academic rigor. This popularized the term in online dating culture.

  • Roissy (Heartiste, 2007–2008): The pseudonymous blogger behind Roissy in DC (launched October 2007) is the earliest traceable user. In early posts, he frames hypergamy as women’s instinctual drive to seek superior mates in non-marital scenarios, such as casual dating or affairs, to optimize genetic fitness. For example, a 2008 post discusses “hypergamy in action” during “one-night stands” where women select for dominance and status over emotional bonds. This ties to PUA “game” tactics for countering perceived female opportunism in hookups. Roissy’s work influenced later redpill ideology, with phrases like “hypergamy doesn’t care” emerging in dating contexts.

  • Rollo Tomassi (2011–2012): Building on Roissy, Tomassi’s The Rational Male blog (started 2011) explicitly defines hypergamy as a “subconscious drive” for non-marital upgrading, e.g., in his March 2012 post “The Hypergamy Conspiracy,” where he describes women pursuing higher-status men via “serial dating” or “mate switching” outside marriage. He credits mid-2000s PUA forums but provides the first systematic lay framework, blending it with EP concepts like short-term mating for “good genes.”

These lay uses exploded post-2012 via Reddit’s r/TheRedPill, reframing hypergamy as an “evolved hindbrain” trigger for app-based dating and infidelity, often with misogynistic overtones (e.g., “AF/BB” for casual sex dynamics).

EP Academic Authors

EP adopted the term more cautiously, initially for marital preferences, but shifted to non-marital uses in the late 2000s with studies on dating selectivity and infidelity. Earlier EP works (e.g., Buss 1989) described the pattern without the word.

  • Y. Bokek-Cohen, Y. Peres, & S. Kanazawa (2008): In “Rational Choice and Evolutionary Psychology as Explanations for Mate Selectivity” (Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology), they first explicitly apply “hypergamy” to non-marital contexts, modeling it as women’s preference for “superior physical attractiveness” in short-term dating and casual pairings. This contrasts rational choice theory with EP, using surveys to show hypergamous selectivity in initial attraction phases, not just commitment.

  • David M. Buss & Todd K. Shackelford (2008): In “Attractive Women Want It All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities, and Emotional Commitment” (Evolutionary Psychology), they define hypergamy as “marrying up in socio-economic status” but extend it to short-term mating, where women calibrate “mate value” for genetic benefits in non-committal encounters. This marks an early EP pivot to dating and hookups, tested via cross-cultural data.

Subsequent EP works, like the 2015 Mate Switching Hypothesis (Buss et al.), built on this, framing hypergamy as “trading up” in serial dating or affairs. Usage grew with online dating studies (e.g., 2020 Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology on app-based hypergamy in hookups).

Category
Author(s)
Year
Non-Marital Context
Key Framing
Lay (Manosphere)
Roissy (Heartiste)
2007–2008
Casual dating, one-night stands
Instinctual drive for dominance in hookups to filter alphas.
Lay (Manosphere)
Rollo Tomassi
2011–2012
Serial dating, mate switching
Dual strategy: short-term sex with high-value men outside LTRs.
EP Academic
Bokek-Cohen, Peres, & Kanazawa
2008
Short-term mate selectivity
Preferences for superior traits in initial attraction/dating.
EP Academic
Buss & Shackelford
2008
Short-term mating for genes
Calibrating status in non-committal pairings.

In summary, lay manosphere authors like Roissy pioneered the explicit non-marital extension around 2007, influencing PUA/redpill dating advice, while EP academics formalized it in 2008 research studies. This parallel development shows cultural bleed: manosphere amplified a simplified version, later echoed in casual EP discussions. For verification, see archived blogs (e.g., Heartiste via Wayback Machine) or journals like Evolutionary Psychology.

Note: This analysis by AI; check cited archival material for accuracy.

Historical Outline: How “Hypergamy” Became Misused in Evolutionary Psychology and Pop Culture

/ gynocentrism

1. Original use in anthropology (late 1800s–mid 1900s)

  • The term hypergamy first appears in sociological and anthropological studies of marriage systems.

  • It described marrying up in caste or class, particularly in South Asian kinship structures (e.g., anuloma marriages).

  • The term was strictly confined to marriage, not mating or sexual choice.

2. Mid-20th century sociology

  • Sociologists expanded the term to marital patterns such as:

    • educational hypergamy

    • income hypergamy

  • Still exclusively about marital unions, not dating or sex.

3. Evolutionary psychology (1980s–2000s)

  • EP researchers discussed female preferences for resources, status, or dominance.

  • But they did not originally use the term “hypergamy”—they spoke of mate preference, mate choice, or resource-acquisition preferences.

4. Misappropriation begins (2000s)

  • Online writers and early Manosphere blogs began borrowing “hypergamy” from sociology, often incorrectly assuming it meant any form of women choosing the highest-status male.

  • The nuance that the term is marriage-specific in origin was lost.

5. Pop-EP amplification (2010s–2020s)

  • Popular accounts of EP (e.g., YouTubers, bloggers, “red-pill” forums) adopted “hypergamy” as a catch-all for non-marital female mating behavior.

  • This created a disconnect between:

    • the literal etymology (marriage),

    • the academic use (marriage),

    • and the new pop-EP usage (sexual or romantic preference in any context).

  • The result is a large-scale catachresis: a word misapplied to a domain to which it does not belong.

6. Why the mistake persists

  • “Hypergamy” sounds more scientific than “preference for higher-status partners.”

  • Very few people check etymology.

  • The term gained memetic traction in online male-strategy communities.

7. Consequence

  • A whole generation of EP enthusiasts now uses a marriage-only word to describe non-marital mating behavior, undermining clarity.

Hypergamy vs. Hypergyny: Why Evolutionary Psychology Has Been Using the Wrong Word All Along

/ gynocentrism

How the Misuse Spread: A Brief Historical Outline

Anthropology (late 19th–early 20th century)

  • The term hypergamy originally emerges in anthropological research on marriage systems.

  • It describes marrying upward in caste or class hierarchies, especially in South Asian kinship structures.

  • It applies exclusively to marriage, not sexual behavior, not dating, not mate preference.

Sociology (mid-20th century)

  • The term expands to describe marital unions such as:

    • educational hypergamy

    • income hypergamy

  • Again: strictly marital.

Early Evolutionary Psychology (1980s–2000s)

  • Researchers studied female mate preferences for resources, status, dominance, and protection, but:

  • They did not use the word “hypergamy.”
    Instead, they described mate choice or resource-acquisition preferences.

Online Manosphere and Pop-EP (2000s–2010s)

  • Bloggers and early “red-pill” communities encountered the word hypergamy in sociological texts and misinterpreted it as meaning:

    “Women always prefer the highest-status man.”

  • The marriage-specific nature of the term was lost.

  • The term spread memetically through:

    • blogs

    • forums

    • YouTube commentary

    • popular EP explainers

The Result

A term that had always meant “marrying upward” was suddenly being used to describe non-marital mating and sexual behavior, creating a large-scale conceptual mistake.

Why This Is a Linguistic Error: The Catachresis Problem

This widespread misuse is an example of catachresis—using a word in a way that contradicts its actual meaning or domain.

The root problem is etymological:

  • Hypergamy derives from Greek gamos = marriage.

  • It does not refer to sexual choice.

  • It does not refer to attraction.

  • It does not refer to dating, hookups, or general mate preference.

Using a marriage-specific term to describe general sexual or romantic behavior is a category mistake. It is like trying to describe casual sex with the word “matrimony” ; the semantic field simply does not match.

What Hypergamy Actually Means

Hypergamy = hyper + gamos

  • hyper- = upward

  • gamos = marriage

The literal meaning is:

“Upward marriage.”

Historically, academically, and etymologically, this term belongs to:

  • caste-marriage systems

  • class-based marital mobility

  • formal marital unions

  • sociological studies of marriage patterns

It does not belong to:

  • dating

  • short-term mating

  • hookups

  • sexual attraction

  • romantic preference

  • evolutionary mate choice contexts

The modern evolutionary-psychology usage is therefore incorrect.

What Evolutionary Psychology Actually Describes

Evolutionary psychology does not focus primarily on marriage, but on mating strategies:

  • short-term mating

  • long-term mating

  • sexual preferences

  • romantic attraction

  • mate competition

  • extra-pair mating

  • resource-based selection

These behaviors are much older than marriage, which is a relatively recent cultural institution.

So EP is fundamentally describing mate choice, not marriage choices.

The everyday statement:

“Women prefer the highest-status man available.”

…describes a mating preference, not a marriage rule.

Thus the term “hypergamy” is inappropriate for EP’s purposes.

The Correct Word: Hypergyny

If we need a term to describe female upward mate preferences across all relational contexts—sexual, romantic, or marital—then we need a term built from the correct root.

That term already exists: hypergyny.

Hyper– + gyne (woman)

  • gyne = woman

  • NOT marriage

  • Unlike gamos, it has no marital connotation.

Literal meaning:

“A woman moving upward.”

Hypergyny therefore correctly refers to:

  • any upward-directed female mate preference

  • attraction to higher-status or higher-resource males

  • upward selection in dating, mating, romance, or sex

It describes the very thing EP commentators mean without importing the erroneous assumption of marriage.

Comparison Table

Term Root Literal meaning Proper domain Accurate for EP’s female mating strategy?
Hypergamy:  gamos = marriage “Upward marriage” Marriage systems, caste/class unions No. Using it for general mating is catachresis.
Hypergyny:  gyne = woman “Woman moving upward” Any female upward-oriented choice Yes. Matches EP’s concept of status-oriented mate choice.

Conclusion

The modern discourse on female mating strategies has been built on a linguistic mistake.

  • Hypergamy has always meant upward marriage.

  • Evolutionary psychology is about mate choice, not marriage systems.

  • The popular EP usage of “hypergamy” is therefore a misuse, a category error, and a clear case of catachresis.

The scientifically and linguistically correct term is:

Hypergyny

—female upward mate preference across all sexual and romantic contexts.

Correcting this terminology not only improves clarity but also prevents the confusion that occurs when marriage-specific words are used to describe non-marital mating behavior.